RSB Show Archives

The Power to Heal is Yours!

RSB Show Archives
Government and MediaRappoport Reports

“Ebola: one covert op feeds into another” by Jon Rappoport

September 27, 2014

Reference: my collection, The Matrix Revealed. Some covert ops start out by focusing on an area of conflict.

The first action-step is: repackaging and renaming and relabeling that area so it looks like something it is not.

When that is done, the group in charge of the op has a false reality, a synthetic reality which they can manage, describe, work with, publicize, deploy, reshape, add to, subtract from.

In the case of West Africa, this synthetic reality is “Ebola.”

In my previous article, I listed the real factors which have been debilitating and killing people in that area for a very long time. These factors have nothing to do with a virus called “Ebola.”

But the op is transformative. It shifts the focus. It paints a different picture. It makes a substitution.

Instead of severe malnutrition, protein-calorie deficit, starvation, contaminated water, horrific wars, grinding poverty, hopelessness, stolen farm land, industrial pollution, the invasion of outside investors and corporations who take over the natural riches of the area, toxic vaccine campaigns, toxic drugs (including vast overuse of antibiotics, which destroys the ability to absorb nutrients)—instead of these chronic conditions, we have a repackaged and re-formed and recreated reality: the virus. Ebola.

The stage magician’s trick. The illusion.

He takes a deck of cards and throws the deck at a wall. The cards fly every which way—chaos, confusion, many things happening all at once. And then, all of a sudden, the cards are lying on the floor, but one card is up against the wall, impaled there by a knife.

The audience gasps.

And on the one card is written the word: Ebola.

Everyone is frozen.

The magician says, “Let me tell you about Ebola. There are many things you need to know. For the moment, we are safe, but we are threatened.”

He has the audience’s attention. Does he ever.

Now he tells a story, a long story, and it ends with the word: “Vaccine.”

The audience experiences a jump-shift. They don’t know it, but they’re being taken into a much larger op—whose subject is “all possible vaccines for everyone from cradle to grave.”

Well, they have certainly heard about vaccines, and most of them have gotten vaccines. They feel they’re on familiar ground.

From “vaccines” he moves to “immunity.”

How wonderful. How magical. With vaccines, doctors can impart protection.

The illusionist is really working his audience now. He’s at the top of his game.

“Vaccines, you see, stimulate the body to produce antibodies, which are marvelous creatures who can move through the whole body and search out invaders…and when they find these intruders, these stalkers, these terrorists, the antibodies paint large Xs on them.”

How beautiful.

“And then the rest of the immune system, the infantry and the air force and navy, know exactly where the enemy is located. They will now launch a multi-front attack, and win.”

The magician describes how vaccines do all this in advance of any actual terrorist invasion, so that when the real monster comes along, the body will be prepared, its immune system already in a state of readiness and high alert.

The magician neglects to mention that the action of vaccines—producing antibodies—does not equal immunity.

Richard Moskowitz, MD, The Case Against Immunizations, 1983:

“In a recent British outbreak of whooping cough, for example, even fully immunized children contracted the disease in fairly large numbers…

“In another recent outbreak of pertussis, 46 of the 85 fully immunized children studied eventually contracted the disease.

“In 1977, 34 new cases of measles were reported on the campus of UCLA, in a population that was supposedly 91% immune, according to careful serological testing.

“Another 20 cases of measles were reported in the Pecos, New Mexico, area within a period of a few months in 1981, and 75% of them had been fully immunized, some of them quite recently.

“A survey of sixth-graders in a well-immunized urban community revealed that about 15% of this age group are still susceptible to rubella, a figure essentially identical with that of the pre-vaccine era.”

“…in 1970/71, there were more than 33,000 cases of pertussis with 41 fatal cases among the very well immunized British child population; whereas in 1974/75, with a declining rate of vaccination, a pertussis epidemic caused only 25,000 cases with 25 fatalities.” —Wolfgang Ehrengut, Lancet, Feb. 18, 1978, p. 370.

“Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children.” —Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company, Ltd., 1987, p. 58.

This is just a sample of available literature on the subject of vaccines failing to impart immunity. And then, of course, there are the “unintended consequences.”

Here is one illustration among many:

“Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, rounded… figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot among America’s children every year.” —DPT: A Shot in the Dark, by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

When the covert-op group begins with a false reality, the one it packaged and shaped and sculpted and promoted, and when the group bases all its subsequent actions on that fabrication, strange consequences can ensue.

“Well, we didn’t predict that. And this—we never thought this would occur. And where did that third thing come from?”

The journal Pediatrics, January 1996, pages 53 and 58. “Changing Levels of Measles Antibody Titers [concentrations] in Women and Children…”:

“The major reason that children fail to respond to the measles vaccine is the presence of passively acquired maternal antibodies.”

What? What does that mean?

It means the child’s mother obtained her immunity to measles when she was a child and had measles—and when, much later in life, she gives birth, she passes this immunity to her baby for a time.

However, this natural process of delivering immunity to the baby interferes with the action of the measles vaccine, when it is eventually given to her child.

The study author is still optimistic, though. “…most women of childbearing age in the United States now acquire measles immunity from vaccination, not from wild [natural] measles virus infection…these women are likely to pass lower levels of the measles antibody to their infants.”

And then the measles vaccine will work for the infants.

In truth, “work” merely means doctors will see “markers” indicating that the vaccine is doing its job—which, as I’ve discussed above, is not the same thing as delivering actual immunity.

Do you see the picture? The idea is, in order for vaccines to “work,” all mothers must acquire “immunity” from vaccinations they received when they were children.

Gaining genuine immunity naturally, through acquiring the actual disease—that must be stamped out, gotten rid of.

Then the circle will be complete. The synthetic artificial circle. Divorced from Nature.

The Matrix Revealed

The magician stops his story. He considers the implications. He hadn’t intended to take things this far. Now he seems to be committed to a different kind of world altogether.

He had been aiming lower. He wanted to use the “Ebola” construct to move his audience into a general acceptance of, and love for, all vaccines. That was the op. That was the whole idea of the op.

He walks offstage; his manager approaches him.

“What’s wrong?” the manager asks him.

“I just saw an unintended consequence,” the magician says, and explains his new revelation.

The manager stares at the magician. “Well,” he says, “welcome to the bigger op. The one you didn’t know was there. We not only want to vaccinate everyone on the planet, we want to induce and shape a new world, in which immunity from disease will be artificially induced and regulated from top to bottom, inside a grand bubble, so to speak.”

The magician feels like he’s about to pass out.

“You mean we’re all going to live under a dome, so nobody can catch a disease naturally anymore? Are you crazy?”

“Not crazy,” the manager says. “Look around you. We’re making a synthetic planet in many ways. Humans are merely biological machines. Think of vaccines as part of a game. They have no true meaning. They’re…rituals of assurance. Social constructs. That’s all. When humans are entirely constructed of artificial parts, and that day will come, we’ll still vaccinate, because we enjoy the ceremony and the traditional meaning of it—care and concern for each other in the great Collective.”

“Under the Great Synthetic Dome.”

“Yes, if you will. Under the Dome.”

And that is how one op can feed into another.

Reality invented for us.

As opposed to us creating our own.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALEDEXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails

2 thoughts on ““Ebola: one covert op feeds into another” by Jon Rappoport

  • Well,seeing that America holds the patent for the Ebola virus(including research),your article is starting to make sense.The corruption involving vaccines needs to be stopped.How is it possible that Merck is even allowed to operate any more?WHO and CDC should be held accountable for their actions and be replaced by independent,non-industry funded groups that are constantly monitored.
    I have noticed the following:The corruption involving vaccines is exactly the same as that of the telecommunications industry.Both have been aware of the dangers involved.Both have been witholding it from the public to protect their profits.During the last few months both have done flip -flops on the CDC’s website,posting statements,witdrawing it,posting basic original statement again.The CDC has lost all credibility.
    In both the vaccine industry and the telecommunications industry,you will find a similar pattern:researchers that find warning signs in their research are either forced to tweak the research,or the following happens:they are fired,grants withdrawn,bad-mouthed by their industry funded peers,some have had death threats..One cannot trust the publications in medical journals either.The journals are funded by the industry.That is unethical.The so called “peer-reviewed” studies-here is a hint-see who sponsored it.It might take some investigation but you will be suprised to see how many studies indicating that the MMR vaccine is safe,were funded by Merck.(directly or indirectly).Exactly the same for the telecom industry.

Comments are closed.